What happens to a performance review task that has been deployed for 350 users if it is an off-cycle task?

When a performance review task is classified as an off-cycle task and has been deployed for a group of users, the capability to edit that task is influenced by its current status. The correct answer highlights that the task can be fully edited if it has not yet been started by any of the users.

This means that if none of the 350 users have engaged with or begun their performance review process, the task remains in a state that allows for complete modifications. Such edits could include changes to the review questions, deadlines, or overall criteria related to the performance review.

This flexibility is particularly useful in dynamic workplace environments where changes might need to be implemented based on evolving business needs, feedback about the review process, or the introduction of new goals. Thus, the ability to fully edit ensures that the performance review aligns effectively with organizational strategies and expectations.

The other options do not accurately capture this flexibility that exists for off-cycle tasks prior to user engagement. Once any user initiates the task, the opportunity to edit would typically be constrained to ensure consistency and integrity in the review process.